Jump to content

Visual Effects Multiplier: Wylie Co. Goes All in on GPU Rendering for 24x Returns


Recommended Posts

Visual effects studios have long relied on render farms — vast numbers of servers — for computationally intensive, complex special effects, but that landscape is rapidly changing.

High silicon and energy costs at these server facilities, which can be restricted in performance gains by Moore’s law, cut into studio profits and increase production time.

To avoid those challenges, Wylie Co. — the visual effects studio behind Oscar-winning Dune, Marvel titles, HBO and Netflix work — is going all in on GPU rendering.

It’s estimated that rendering photoreal visual effects and stylized animations consumes nearly 10 billion CPU core hours a year. To render a single animated feature film, render farms can involve more than 50,000 CPU cores working for more than 300 million CPU core hours. These  resources can create a substantial carbon effect and physical footprint.

While many studios already use GPUs for one leg of the rendering process, Wylie Co. is now using it for about everything, including final renders as well as for AI used in wire removals and many other aspects of compositing and visual effects workflows.

Move to GPUs Boosts Performance 24X 

Render farms allow visual effects studios to offload large files of images, scenes or entire feature films, freeing up studio resources while these jobs may take hours or weeks to finish.

Many studios are moving to multi-GPU workstations that can handle some of the tasks that were previously sent to render farms. This enables studios to iterate faster as well as compress production time and costs.

Wylie Co. migrated to GPUs across a number of areas, realizing overall a 24x performance leap compared with CPUs1.

GPUs Deliver 10X Lower Energy Usage


While studios would like to reduce their costs from these compute-heavy rendering tasks, the reality is that the decreased energy and space costs also bring a lower carbon footprint benefit.

GPUs used in visual effects rendering pipelines can increase performance by as much as 46x2 while reducing energy consumption by 5x and capital expenses by 6x.

By switching to GPUs, the industry stands to save $900 million in acquisition costs worldwide and 215 gigawatt hours in energy consumed compared with using CPU-based render farms.


Learn about NVIDIA energy-efficiency solutions for digital rendering



1 25X performance for an NVIDIA Quadro RTXTM 8000 (4x GPUs per node) vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6126 processor (2x 12-core CPUs per node).
2 46X performance for NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada generation (8x GPUs per node) vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6430 (2x 32-core CPUs per node). Performance and energy findings based on internal and industry benchmarks.

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines Privacy Policy.