Leesy Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 The verdict will come any day now. What do you all think will be the verdict? Guilty or not. I actually think he will be charged with something. Not sure what though. I don't think he'll be going to jail. He couldn't survive a jail sentence if he did get sent there. Quote
Moody Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 I think he's innocent ! He is weird and he likes kids so I say someone used the situation..Everyone knows what some people can do for money..But I think he will be charged with something though, but if he goes to jail he will commit suicide. If not someone else will get him. Quote
[FF5]Knix Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 I think he is guilty, but will be found innocent. After the O.J fiasco of '94, I don't have any faith with the judicial system out in La-La Land California. To much sun on the head causes brain damage. Quote
Spacko Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 I agree with Moody here. I don't want to believe it and frankly I don't either. Jocko is a wacko spacko, but no molester. Quote
[TNT] Sonic Goo Posted June 8, 2005 Posted June 8, 2005 The problem with these things is, they're extremely hard to prove. And from what I've seen (though I've tried to avoid it) this case is not much different. Quote
Moody Posted June 8, 2005 Posted June 8, 2005 I just heard that he has been found guilty and got 11 years in prison! Quote
Factor Posted June 8, 2005 Posted June 8, 2005 guilty! he slept in a bed with kids, i dont think it matters what he did with them, its the fact that he slept in a bed with them at all. would u feel safe with ur young son sleeping in bed with him? i know i wouldnt Quote
Guest BritneySpears Posted June 9, 2005 Posted June 9, 2005 Guilty! This is not the first time they said he 'did weird things.' Those fans are absurd! They only know his music, not himself. Quote
NiteSnipe Posted June 9, 2005 Posted June 9, 2005 I think he is guilty. I think castration would be the only effective punishment. Quote
Moody Posted June 9, 2005 Posted June 9, 2005 I'm not sure there is anything to remove Just look at his face, who knows what its like on other places Quote
Jacques Posted June 11, 2005 Posted June 11, 2005 The fact is he only may touch child,,,, he didn't storm them. It wouldn't change anything Quote
RXS Posted June 11, 2005 Posted June 11, 2005 For me, where there is smoke there is fire. He has repeatedly been in similar, compromising situations in the past and has had to pay LARGE sums of money to keep it out of legal courts (smells like a buy off). The repeat offenses demonstrate a pattern that is similar to those of an addict that can't control his urges. Apparently, his finances are in bad shape so one can only speculate that he can't settle out of court like he used to. This went to court because the prosecutor felt there was enough evidence to convict him without reasonable doubt. The evidence I have seen through the media is damning and the repeat pattern leads me to believe he is GUILTY. We'll have to see if the jury feels that way as well Quote
Leesy Posted June 14, 2005 Author Posted June 14, 2005 Well I still not 100% if he was totally innocent or not. I do think that he "needed" this court case though. If he is on the verge of bankrupcy, nothing like a good old court case to boost your record sales. Quote
Spacko Posted June 14, 2005 Posted June 14, 2005 Well I certainly hope he hasn't done any such thing to a defenseless child. Although a thing like this is incredibly hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt, I'm sticking to the principle of every truly democratic justice system; he's innocent because he was not proven guilty. Quote
Scorpio Posted June 14, 2005 Posted June 14, 2005 they sai he was not guilty and i also think he's innocent.. ppl are just after his money, those weirdo's would sue a shop if they bumped their little toe on a door Quote
[FF5]Knix Posted June 14, 2005 Posted June 14, 2005 Ahhh the California legal system. Freak show out there. I saw the same thing go down with the Rondney King, O.J, and Robert Blake trials, and now this. They can take all the nice weather they want, but that state has no soul, no life, no substance. It's all front, a freeeeeeeak show. If his lawyer would put on a good show Pol Pot would have gotten an acquital in the L.A courts. Quote
NiteSnipe Posted June 15, 2005 Posted June 15, 2005 If you guys are going to commit a crime, California is the place to be apparently. You don't even need that much money to buy justice. Quote
Spacko Posted June 15, 2005 Posted June 15, 2005 Come on guys - what are you labelling a man a child abuser for when the truth is none of us can know this? If you ask someone who's been wrongfully accused of such a crime I'm sure they will tell you it was the greatest horror of their lives. Naturally the kids in these situations are the number one priority, but if you try I bet you can imagine Jacko's situation. If you were there you would want to be considered innocent until proven guilty, right? He was acquitted by a US court as good as any other. People who have studied all the evidence and heard of nothing else for months found this guy innocent. So please stop whining and for heavens sake stop judging on assumptions and hunches as if this is some kind of game or joke. Quote
[FF5]Knix Posted June 15, 2005 Posted June 15, 2005 mari its not like this guy was just in the wrong place at the wrong time! This is the 2nd time he was brought up on charges of such misconduct (the first being settled out of court for major $$$). He has admited to sleeping with young boys in the same bed, and see's no problem with this. He has not had the most successfull relationships with people his age (duh!). My point was that this kind of stuff is par for the course in California. When was the last famous person found guilty in Caly by a jury of his/her peers? If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, and sounds like a duck.....its probably a duck. So yea he's innocent, but no way i'm not going to say that I agree with the verdict. I expected it no doubt. Quote
Scorpio Posted June 16, 2005 Posted June 16, 2005 right, he buils a amusement park in his backyard just caus he wants to molest the children coming to ride his rollercoaster Quote
Spacko Posted June 16, 2005 Posted June 16, 2005 Sigh. Well we're all guessing but at least I'm not calling him a criminal and a gruesome person without knowing what the heck I'm talking about. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.